#TheJimmyDoreShow EXPLOSIVE Truth About Vaccines & COVID w/Inventor Of mRNA Vaccine Technology, Robert Malone

by

@ 19:14

19:13
so
19:15
let me ask you uh i heard you say so
19:17
you’re kind of explaining
19:19
uh something i heard you say before that
19:23
we can’t vaccinate our way out of this
19:25
pandemic and we shouldn’t be trying to
19:27
do that
19:29
and you kind of i think what you just
19:30
did was kind of explain why can you just
19:32
expand on that a little more
19:35
so um
19:37
for me you can appreciate i’m a little
19:39
sensitive to people taking credit for my
19:41
ideas
19:42
[Laughter]
19:44
and so it’s really important to me to
19:46
give credit to other people
19:48
uh it’s you know like i say i’ve been
19:50
sensitized to this so
19:52
in my case
19:54
there are many other physicians and
19:56
scientists and most notably gert
19:58
vandenbosch who i used to work with at
20:00
salve
20:02
have pointed out
20:04
that and really uh championed the logic
20:08
and uh
20:10
um
20:11
and taken the hits in the press and
20:14
wikipedia and everywhere else for having
20:16
done so
20:18
making the point that um
20:21
in in a
20:24
in a outbreak
20:26
when
20:27
there is very active spread of high
20:30
levels of virus
20:32
you cannot vaccinate your way out
20:35
of
20:36
the risk of that virus during an active
20:39
outbreak
20:40
with an imperfect leaky vaccine
20:44
and that’s what we have we have a
20:47
vaccine
20:48
that currently
20:50
various estimates coming from israel and
20:53
other places
20:54
suggest that its ability to prevent
20:57
infection
20:59
is something in the range of 40 to 60
21:02
percent
21:03
so let’s just take the the middle point
21:05
there
21:06
that means that if you go kiss your
21:08
spouse and she’s got an active virus
21:11
infection
21:12
um
21:13
in general your probability of being
21:15
protected
21:17
in that case
21:19
where you’ve been exposed to a goodly
21:20
amount of virus is about half
21:23
so
21:24
half of you that have that experience
21:27
may be protected if you’ve taken vaccine
21:29
the other half won’t
21:31
and if you do get
21:33
infected the virus will replicate at at
21:36
least if not higher levels
21:39
of replication in your body than if you
21:42
weren’t
21:43
vaccinated
21:44
and you will be producing
21:47
the same or higher levels of virus in
21:49
your nose in your mouth in the places
21:52
where you can
21:53
shed it and potentially infect other
21:55
people
21:56
the same levels or higher than somebody
22:00
who had been previously vaccinated now
22:02
what that means functionally
22:05
is that
22:07
with these now
22:09
further evolved virus strains like delta
22:12
lambda and mu
22:15
we’re in a situation
22:17
in which the virus is increasingly
22:20
infectious
22:21
increasingly able to transmit from one
22:24
person to another person
22:26
and when you do the
22:29
the math
22:31
the epidemiology can model these things
22:33
when you do the math
22:35
even if we all had perfect practice and
22:38
in 95 masks all the time
22:42
the best we could do is slow these
22:43
viruses down they will spread through
22:45
the population
22:47
okay so we need to come to grips with
22:49
that
22:50
these are leaky vaccines
22:53
and this policy of universal vaccination
22:57
isn’t going to get us
22:59
to
23:00
being able to get back to normal
23:02
furthermore
23:04
what we now know is if that isn’t bad
23:06
enough
23:07
is that to the extent they do provide
23:10
protection
23:11
these vacs the protection seems to peter
23:13
out at about half a year after
23:15
vaccination
23:17
so then we’re in a position where
23:19
well maybe we can re-vaccinate and we’ve
23:22
heard the biden administration talking
23:23
about the taking the jab again so a
23:26
third jab
23:28
the problem with that is that they made
23:30
those decisions
23:32
without actually having any data
23:35
to support that
23:37
and
23:38
that has kind of been a problem all the
23:40
way through this when we’ve heard dr
23:42
fauci or others
23:44
saying well we should do this or we
23:45
should do that or we should do the other
23:47
thing
23:48
and they’re flying by the seat of their
23:50
pants
23:51
they’re substituting opinion for data
23:54
and that might be okay if we were doing
23:56
animal experiments or we had a few
23:58
monkeys that we were going to be testing
24:00
out a hypothesis but it’s not okay when
24:04
we’re going to implement authoritarian
24:06
measures
24:07
across the country or across the world
24:10
in which we mandate everybody takes this
24:12
that of the other intervention you darn
24:15
well better have rock solid data saying
24:17
that that’s a good idea
24:19
and even then i object to doing it
24:22
i believe in the sanctity of the
24:24
individual
24:26
is is more important than the sanctity
24:29
of the collective that’s my personal
24:31
opinion and i think i’m backed by a an
24:34
ancient document a little over 200 years
24:36
old called the constitution of the
24:38
united states
24:40
so
24:41
that’s that’s where i stand is the
24:43
sanctity of the individual
24:45
and the underlying logic here that’s
24:48
being advanced
24:50
will not get us to where the promised
24:53
land that we’re being pointed towards it
24:56
will not get us back
24:58
to normalcy
24:59
it won’t get us back to economic
25:03
strength
25:05
it won’t get us back
25:06
to our jobs
25:09
and this logic that we’re going to
25:11
vaccinate
25:12
mandate vaccination in
25:15
you know this company or that company
25:18
or
25:19
across the military or whatever
25:22
when you look at it now
25:24
it is outdated and grossly naive
25:28
the vaccinated can spread infection and
25:30
disease
25:32
the unvaccinated can spread infectious
25:34
disease
25:36
and the vaccine to the extent the
25:37
vaccine provides benefit
25:39
and only is good for about six months
25:42
so then
25:43
okay we all going to take re-vaccination
25:46
every six months could there be a
25:47
problem with that well actually there is
25:51
okay that logic
25:53
it absolutely requires data
25:56
because those of us that have uh gray
26:00
hair and have been around a little while
26:02
in the vaccine world
26:04
know and understand immunology know that
26:07
there’s a thing called high zone
26:08
tolerance vaccines
26:11
are not linear dose response in vaccines
26:14
are not linear the immune system is
26:16
really complicated
26:18
and more is not always better sometimes
26:21
more can turn off the immune system
26:24
can shut it down
26:26
so we can’t just assume
26:28
that a third jab or a fourth jab or a
26:31
fifth jab
26:32
is gonna do good it actually might
26:35
make the immune response
26:38
worse
26:39
not only in people who have just
26:41
received vaccine but potentially also in
26:44
those that have the benefits of natural
26:46
infection
26:48
so it’s just bad science it’s bad policy
26:52
it’s bad ethics
26:53
and
26:54
we’ve got to slow down the government
26:57
has to
26:59
get away
27:00
from this seed of the pants
27:02
you know fly by intuition
27:05
kind of thinking
27:06
based on the opinion of one individual
27:09
which seems to be often what’s going on
27:11
and you know who i’m speaking of
27:14
and we have to get back to this thing
27:16
called evidence-based medicine which is
27:19
what i was trained to do
27:21
and most of us were trained to do
27:23
the other thing we got to get back to in
27:25
my opinion
27:27
is stopping
27:28
this
27:29
bureaucrats or tony fauci
27:32
dictating to physicians how they should
27:35
practice medicine
27:36
allow physicians to practice medicine to
27:40
practice their art for good heavens um
27:42
there are drugs
27:44
that many physicians and there is
27:46
significant data supporting this
27:48
believe can
27:50
keep people out of the hospital
27:52
now for some reason
27:55
uh in in you and i have theories about
27:58
what that might be having to do with
28:00
conflicts of interest and the financial
28:02
interests of the pharmaceutical industry
28:05
for some reason the government is
28:07
adamantly opposed to early treatment
28:09
i don’t get it
28:11
it’s bad medicine it’s bad policy when
28:14
have we ever had a situation
28:16
where patients go
28:19
to the emergency room
28:21
they go to the hospital
28:24
they go to their physicians they say i’m
28:26
having trouble breathing doc
28:28
somebody tests their blood oxygen and
28:30
says well it’s low but it’s not low
28:32
enough go back home and come back when
28:34
you’re really sick
28:36
um
28:37
you know uh when when have we ever had
28:39
this this is insanity
28:42
uh and and it’s totally
28:45
antithetical
28:46
to
28:48
good medical practice
28:50
and now we’re having a position
28:52
where
28:53
you know appointed bureaucrats in state
28:56
medical boards and
28:58
uh the american medical association in
29:02
chicago
29:03
which is largely a bunch of lobbyists
29:06
sit around and say oh no thou shalt not
29:08
do this or thou shalt not do that
29:11
um
29:12
you know based on
29:14
what appears to be
29:16
a lobbying and influence of the
29:18
pharmaceutical industry it’s it is
29:21
killing americans
29:24
it is killing people worldwide
29:26
and how do we know that
29:29
okay
29:30
we’re always told we have the best
29:31
medical system in the world right
29:33
well we certainly have the most
29:35
expensive that is for sure
29:38
and if you run the graph and look at
29:40
outcomes from coven
29:42
and compare them by nation in terms of
29:45
death
29:46
um
29:48
in in mortality incidents per case
29:52
what you see in those curves is that
29:54
just about everybody is beating the
29:55
pants off of us
29:57
including the country the poor countries
30:00
um
30:00
that are using things like ivermectin

+++

30:00
um
30:00
that are using things like ivermectin
30:03
and hydroxychloroquine
30:05
so
30:06
something’s not right here we’re
30:08
spending tons of money
30:10
the government is telling physicians how
30:12
to practice medicine
30:14
uh and people are dying here at a higher
30:16
rate than they are in a lot of other
30:18
places
30:19
and uh i think that uh
30:23
there is certainly the signs
30:25
that uh something’s rotten in denmark
30:29
and uh
30:30
why don’t we get back to a position
30:33
where
30:34
we stop letting the pharmaceutical
30:36
industry dictate
30:38
what we should do
30:40
and start allowing physicians
30:42
to practice their art
30:45
um so just
30:48
just so i’m clear on what you mean
30:51
when you when you say so you’re you’re
30:53
definitely pro-vax you’re
30:55
that your whole life has been dedicated
30:56
to developing vaccines
30:58
and you’re the you’re the pioneer of the
31:00
mrna vaccine
31:02
technology um
31:06
so
31:08
what do you mean when you say
31:10
so because you’re pro-vaccine but this
31:12
vaccine you say is leaky what does leaky
31:15
mean
31:17
almost all vaccines are leaky it’s a
31:19
question of degree so this is actually a
31:21
technical term uh i didn’t just make it
31:24
up
31:25
what it has to do with is the ability
31:28
it’s a characterization of the ability
31:30
of the vaccine to prevent the spread of
31:34
the disease
31:35
between individuals
31:38
and
31:39
ideally
31:41
a vaccine that’s going to be used for
31:43
containment or prevention
31:46
for instance we talk about the pediatric
31:49
vaccines or we talk about influenza
31:52
vaccines okay
31:54
we try to to administer those in times
31:57
when the virus is not circulating
32:00
okay
32:01
the way those things work is we give as
32:05
many people as possible before the
32:07
vaccine before the virus
32:09
is circulating so for instance with
32:11
influenza we deploy influenza vaccine in
32:14
the off season
32:16
and it provides imperfect protection
32:19
but enough protection that the virus
32:21
can’t get its foot in the door
32:24
and
32:25
start spreading wildly within the
32:28
population that’s the logic
32:31
in this case
32:33
the wolf isn’t not just in the door he’s
32:35
in in the kitchen
32:37
right uh he’s he’s in our houses
32:40
and our businesses and our workplaces
32:42
and everything else
32:44
and
32:45
we that takes a different strategy
32:48
so a leaky vaccine virtually all
32:50
vaccines are leaky
32:52
those of us that have done animal
32:54
research and non-human primate research
32:56
and vaccines know
32:58
that you can overwhelm any vaccine with
33:01
enough virus or pathogen okay
33:04
so no vaccine is perfect but this one is
33:06
particularly imperfect
33:08
in that the protection against disease
33:12
is
33:12
modest
33:15
you know as i mentioned something
33:17
protection against infection is
33:18
something like 40 to 60 percent and
33:20
going down as the virus evolves
33:24
uh and
33:26
that’s never going to be able to get us
33:28
to the nirvana that we seek which is
33:31
herd immunity
33:32
because it’s leaky does that make sense
33:35
yes
33:36
yes that makes sense to me that
33:38
because people who are vaccinated can
33:41
still spread the vaccine doesn’t stop
33:43
you from spreading the virus
33:45
precisely
33:46
and um
33:48
it’s actually only about on average
33:50
something like about 50 percent
33:53
uh protected from you getting infected
33:55
if you’ve had the jabs
33:57
and that actually only lasts for about
34:00
six months
34:02
whereas if you have been infected and
34:06
recovered like i have
34:08
and to my great surprise although i was
34:11
infected and had serious covet
34:14
in february late february of 2020
34:18
i got infected with the boston outbreak
34:20
which is very early in the states
34:23
and i thought i was never going to be
34:24
the same again i just got my pulmonary
34:26
function test back
34:28
and i’m a hundred percent i’m within
34:30
normal limits so
34:32
this disease um it kills i don’t wish to
34:37
i’m not saying it’s the flu believe me
34:40
i’ve had it
34:41
you do not want to have this disease if
34:43
you can avoid it
34:45
i had it very early when we had
34:46
virtually no drugs matter of fact i
34:49
discovered one of the drugs that appears
34:50
to be effective by treating myself and
34:53
that’s pepsid
34:55
i’m not here to push pepsid
34:57
but
34:58
that’s the situation i encountered and
35:00
yet i survived

+++

One Response to “#TheJimmyDoreShow EXPLOSIVE Truth About Vaccines & COVID w/Inventor Of mRNA Vaccine Technology, Robert Malone”

  1. rosettasister Says:

    EXPLOSIVE Truth About Vaccines & COVID w/Inventor Of #mRNA Vaccine Technology, Robert Malone

    #TheJimmyDoreShow

    #TheJimmyDoreShow EXPLOSIVE Truth About Vaccines & COVID w/Inventor Of mRNA Vaccine Technology, Robert Malone

    No vaccine is perfect but this one is particularly imperfect in that the protection against disease is modest

    Protection against infection is something like 40 to 60 percent and going down as the virus evolves

    That’s never going to get us to the nirvana that we seek which is #herdimmunity

Comments are closed.